| |

return
to list of language debates
 Links in this essay will take you to information about the usage experts and their work. Numbers in parentheses are page references.
To read about this topic in The Bedford
Handbook, see section
23. |
|
Many students are so spooked by the
word you that they avoid it at all costs. Some of
these students may have had a teacher who preached that
you is never acceptable in writing. Others may
simply be confused about when the second-person
(you) point of view is appropriate. Such
confusion is not surprising. English teachers hold
varying opinions, and usage experts who choose to
address the matter (many don’t) offer conflicting
advice.
Certainly no expert
argues that it is wrong to use you when the
writer has reason to speak directly to readers, as when
offering advice or giving instructions. In such
contexts, you is the reader-friendly approach. As
William Zinsser puts it, “The voice of a Dr. Spock
talking to the mother of a child with a fever, or the
voice of a Julia Child talking to the cook stalled in
mid-recipe, is one of the most reassuring sounds a
reader can hear” (124).
In business writing,
the you point of view is often appropriate. In
many contexts, you is friendlier than the
third person and more straightforward as well.
YOU VERSUS THE THIRD PERSON
You [not Our clients] may call our consumer
hotline twenty-four hours a day.
Clearly, using
you to address readers directly can be good
style. But what about using you indefinitely to
mean “one” or “anyone in general”? On this point, usage
experts disagree. Surprisingly, some see nothing wrong
with such uses. As a matter of fact, The American
Heritage Dictionary of the English Language lists
you meaning “one” as appropriate and gives an
informal sentence as its sole example: You can’t win
them all. (Oddly, this dictionary—famous for its usage
panel—provides no usage note.)
Some who approve of
the indefinite you seem to do so out of dislike
for the indefinite pronoun one. For example, R.
H. Copperud writes, “You for one is
acceptable, and indeed preferable if the writer wants to
strike an informal conversational tone: ‘You can see the
ocean from here on a clear day’” (447). Kenneth Wilson
shows why one is problematic:
Should one begin an impersonal statement with
one, or should you start off with
you? Style is the problem: one can sound
very formal and self-consciously elevated, especially to
Americans (the British use one much more
frequently). (308)
The issue, it seems,
is level of formality. In informal, conversational
speech and writing, we can often get away with using the
indefinite you, and you may in fact be
preferable to one—at least in American
English.
Not all writing is
informal, however, and one is rarely the only
alternative to you. In formal academic writing
most professors would object to a sentence like this one:
By the 1870s, you could no longer find good land for
homesteading in the prairies of the
Midwest.
This use of you is too informal, and we can
easily fix the sentence without resorting to one.
Here are two possibilities:
By the 1870s, pioneers could no longer find good land
for homesteading in the prairies of the
Midwest.
By the 1870s, few good tracts of land were available
for homesteaders in the prairies of the
Midwest.
Conclusion: Feel
free to use you when addressing readers directly.
When you want to refer to anyone in general, avoid
you in formal writing, and do your best to avoid
one as well.
|